![]() This article assesses Halliday's contribution to the study of revolutions, and sets out an approach which both recognises and extends his work. It may be that one of the reasons for Halliday's failure to make apparent the importance of revolutions to IR audiences was that, for all his empirical illustrations of how revolutions affected the international realm, he did not formulate a coherent theoretical scheme which spoke systematically to the discipline. ![]() In this way, dynamics of revolution and counter-revolution are closely associated with processes of international conflict, intervention and war. For Halliday, this is out of keeping with their impact - in particular, revolutions offer a systemic challenge to existing patterns of international order in their capacity to generate alternative orders founded on novel forms of political rule, economic organisation and symbolic authority. ![]() However, while war occupies a prominent place in the IR, revolutions inhabit a more residual location. Fred Halliday saw revolution and war as the dual motors of modern international order.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |